Cloud Chamber Scrubber Case Studies

Case Study #1: Glass Furnace Exhaust, Redirected to UltraCat Filter System

Case Study #2: Glass Fiber Manufacturing

Case Study #3: Fiber Optics Manufacturing

Case Study #4: Abrasives – & Other Non-Soluble PM2.5 & Submicron Particulate

Case Study #6: Diesel Exhaust Emissions / Locomotive Diesel Pollution

Case Study #7: Diesel Exhaust Emissions / Ships at Port

Case Study #4: CCS vs. Electrostatic Precipitator for Abrasives, Ceramics, Non-Soluble PM2.5

Manufacturing Processes. Applications where conventional equipment is very inefficient or
expensive to operate and maintain provide an opportunity for the Cloud Chamber Scrubber
(CCS) to showcase its unique capabilities. Abrasives manufacturing is a typical example.

CCS Cloud Chamber technology was chosen by Saint-Gobain Advanced Ceramics Corp.
for the collection of boric acid emissions from induction furnaces.  Saint-Gobain is a world leader
in the manufacture and distribution of boron nitride products. Furnaces operate at 2000°C.

An analysis of the particle distribution of the emissions indicates about one-third of the particles
are smaller than 0.4 micron, with two-thirds less than 1 micron. Over 80% is PM2.5. In this difficult
application, a five-stage wet electrostatic precipitator (Wet ESP) was piloted first, with
unsatisfactory results.

The subsequent success of the CCS, with over 99% efficiency, highlights its ability to treat a
broader range of particulate composition, specifically PM2.5, at a fraction of the operating cost of an
electrostatic precipitator. The CCS system has been in place since early 2000 and operating 24/7.

Plant management also reports high satisfaction with the extremely low maintenance required
for the CCS, compared with an electrostatic precipitator. It consists primarily of routine preventative
maintenance such as tightening belts or lubricating bearings on pumps and fans during the
annual plant shutdown. Download article published in Ceramic Industry.

Considering an electrostatic precipitator? Tell Us About It . . .
We Can Help You with Some Cost-efficient Alternatives.

For more information on how CCS performance compares with that of an
electrostatic precipitator, contact: Kevin Moss (801) 294-5422
kevin.moss@tri-mer.com

(NOTE: For larger particulate, see Whirl /Wet® page.)

See our Electrostatic Precipitator page for more information.

CCS HOME / CCS NEWS / CLOUD CHAMBER SCRUBBER BROHURE /
CCS or Fabric Filters / Baghouses? Considerations and Comparisons /
HISTORY / PILOT TESTING / CCS Q&A / CONTACT US / TRI-MER HOME

Tri-Mer Corporation
1400 Monroe Street
P.O. Box 730
Owosso, MI  48867; USA
Phone:  (989) 723-7838
Fax:  (989) 723-7844
salesdpt@tri-mer.com

© Copyright 2011 Tri-Mer Corporation
Website designed by Marketing Services Inc.

CCS or
Fabric Filters / Baghouses?
Considerations & Comparisons

The CCS vs.
Electrostatic
Precipitator

Have a Potential Application for
an electrostatic
precipitator?
Tell Us About It
. . . We Can
suggest a
better performing
alternative.

Contact:
Kevin Moss
ph: 801.294.5422
Email